About Me

Name: Kel-C
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

New Site

I'm sure many of you have given up on my blog.  Well, I've been a little busy.  My friend is getting married, and I had to make her 220 invitations.  And plan her shower. 
 
I have also been working on my own blog.  So, I'm going to be blogging more often, but not here.  You can now find me at:
 
 
See you over there!
Tags: Misc  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Moral Equivalency

Last night on Hannity and Colmes, the two hosts had a verbal scuffle over the treatment of Edwards's affair vs. McCain's affair.  
 
Hannity asked the panel how Edwards could be trusted with his promises to the country (if he had become the President) when he can't keep a vow to the people he loves most.  When Colmes got his chance, he asked the same question about McCain, who admitted to cheating on his first wife when he returned from Vietnam.  While I think the question is valid, neither Hannity nor the other panelists could give a decent answer.  The panelists said McCain's affair was fully vetted or brought the discussion back to Edwards.  Hannity said it was understandable because McCain was tortured and came back a changed man.  But no one answered Colmes's question.
 
Here's why the two are different.  Almost every person who would run for office has made a mistake of some sort in his or her life or has come to change his or her mind about the world (I know I have - I was a Democrat before I went to college).  Short of serious crimes such as treason, bribery, or murder, I look at a politician's horizon of about 15 years.  That's why I could care less about Obama's drug use or Bush's alcohol use or McCain's affair or the HUGE glasses Hillary wore in the 70's while working against Nixon.  We all make mistakes. 
 
The past 15 years is what has most shaped how a person is today.  John McCain cheated on his first wife more than 25 years ago.  By all accounts (with the exception of a hit piece in the New York Times), he has been faithful to his current wife and has overcome almost all of the personal problems that led him to cheat in the first place (he apparently has a slight temper, though).  Those years also show his record of voting and how he stands on issues.  That's what makes me want to vote for him.
 
Now take Obama's past 15 years.  Rev. Wright.  William Ayers.  Chicago politics.  The votes he's made in the Senate to date.  That's all I need to know.  I don't care if he smoked pot and did tons of coke and was enamored with Communist poetry in college.  I don't care if his parents had him in a Muslim school when he was child and had no say in the matter.  Look at his record over the past 15 years, and there is no comparison to McCain's. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tyson Gives In

Well, looks like Tyson is definitely a hen and not a rooster.
 
Tyson reopened negotiations with the union at their Shelbyville, TN plant in order to reinstate Labor Day and reduce the amount of bad press they've been getting.  The company succeeded, and now employees at that plant will have Labor Day off.  The Muslim holiday Eid al-Fitr will now be covered under a personal holiday, which can also be used to replace the employee birthday holiday for non-Muslims that was lost.

So now, half of the plant will be empty on one day because it's now a floating holiday and not everyone will take that day off.  That's tough for planning, but boycotters don't care.  Just don't give in to any religion except Christianity. 
Tags: religion  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Boycott Tyson?

A large company has allowed for a religious holiday to be observed by its employees instead of another traditional holiday.  Over half of its employees celebrate this holiday, and the contract with this new provision was passed by 80% of the unionized members (1,000 out of 1,200 total employees). 
 
So why are boycotts against this company being called for?  Because the religious holiday being celebrated is a Muslim one.

It was 
announced that one of the Tyson Foods poultry processing plants would be giving up Labor Day holiday for Eid-al-Fitr, a day of celebration that marks the end of Ramadan in the fall. This change does not affect Tyson's other 119 plants.  Muslims make up over 50% of the workforce at that location, 700 of 1,200 employees. 
 
Each employee gets eight paid holidays a year, the same amount as before the new contract.  The other seven holidays are the employee's birthday, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas. 
 
What is the big deal?  If this were a case of changing Labor Day for Good Friday because 700 of 1,200 employees are Catholic and would like that day off instead, we'd see praise!  In this case, these Muslims aren't asking for anything extraordinary.  This is an important day for them, and they are the majority in this case.  They asked their non-government employer to make a change, and almost 70% of the employees voted for it.  While I'm no fan of unions, the company decided that would be a fair accommodation to make during negotiations for a new contract so they agreed to it.
 
I, for one, will continue to support Tyson fully.  In fact, I bought myself some yummy chicken nuggets this morning just because I saw this story.  
Tags: religion  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Obama Fifty

Through all of this my-statement-was-not-about-race garbage when Obama said the GOP would scare voters by contrasting him with those on the currency, I have wondered what Obama really meant if it wasn't about race.

First of all, it's garbage that this comment wasn't about race.  He's said it directly before.  I saw Tom Daschle on Fox News Sunday, and he almost couldn't keep a straight face when he said that the comment was about Obama's age compared to Presidents on currency. 

Another Obama surrogate was on The O'Reilly Factor Friday trying to tell Laura Ingraham that it's because he's more about change than any other President.  Really?  More change than Washington, who only lead the revolution to create the country, or Lincoln, who ended slavery?  C'mon!
 
So, what DID he mean when he said that?  I think it all has to do with his ego.  Sure, he wants to be President to feed his ego and have power and be the first black President.  But we all know what comes with that.  Hours after he passes after a long after his Presidency would end, there would be a bill on the floor of Congress that would forever immortalize him on our currency.  Maybe he'd replace Grant on the $50 bill.  That would probably be like the $1 bill by the time he passes. 
 
He doesn't just want to be President, he wants to be immortal! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Very Reliable Coverage Study

During the course of the day, I tend to leave the television on Fox News Channel for background noise, kind of like some people leave the radio on.  It tends to be repetitive during the day, so I don't pay that much attention to it.  My two-year-old daughter and I just go about our business counting and coloring.

This morning, we were getting ready to go out shopping, and I had a replay of last night's Hannity and Colmes on.  They started talking about the polls that have come out recently on Obama and his trip.  My daughter turned to me and said, "Obama!"  I was floored. 
 
I fast-forwarded to a part where they were talking about some McCain numbers, and I asked her, "McCain?"  She didn't respond.  They started talking about Obama again, and she yelled out gleefully, "Obama!" 
 
So what does this tell us?  Since kids learn through repetition, I think Fox News Channel has been talking WAY too much about Obama!  And if FNC discusses him that much, then you can imagine what my daughter would be saying if I left it on MSNBC!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AP Slant

Most of the time, the AP decries labels.  They won't even call the Taliban "terrorists."  But they have no problem making sure everyone knows a corrupt senator is a Republican.
 
Yesterday, the AP put out a story about the indictment of Senator Ted Stevens with the headline, "GOP Senator accused of making false statements."  The story emphasizes the point by using "Republican" as the sixth word of the article.
 
But Democrats get different treatment.

The same AP put out another 
story yesterday titled, "Ex-Newark mayor gets 27 months for corruption." 
 
Since it came out of Jersey, I figured he was a Democrat.  At first glance, I didn't see the title in the story at all.  I went out and Googled him to find out that yes, he was a Democrat.  After re-reading the article, I saw it mentioned he was also a "Democratic state senator" in the sixth paragraph.
 
So here's the AP list:
Terrorist -- not OK
Democrat -- if negative story, OK only if you have to
Republican -- if negative story, print multiple times
Tags: AP  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iraq is Back

Yea!  The IOC reversed its decision to ban the Iraqi delegation to Beijing.  The two eligible athletes were being held up by some technicalities over the Iraqi National Olympic Committee, which have been resolved during talks.  Five other athletes were going to go, but they were held up during this limbo and are now no longer eligible. 

I'm glad to see the IOC take this step.  With that country in so much turmoil, it's good that the focus will be off the war and on the athletes for a few days. 
Tags: other  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cali Quake Rant

So, SoCal had another earthquake today.  I think FNC has had only one commercial break for almost two hours of coverage, showing the same pictures over and over.  Why?  Nothing happened!

It wasn't a huge quake.  A couple of watermains broke, something was on fire briefly, and there were many aftershocks in the ten minutes after the event.  Are they waiting for some big building to crumble to the ground?  Maybe they are waiting for a triple-decker highway to collapse on itself. 
 
They pulled in disaster "expert" Bobby Jindal (great man) because he's now governor of the Katrina state.  But he wasn't even in that office during the event.
 
Even funnier, Shep Smith kept telling everyone to stay off their cell phones while streaming video of one of the correspondents played while she was driving down the highway.  She was on her cell phone talking to Shep about what she was seeing (basically nothing).
 
I guess I'm bitter because I'm in part of the flyover country (we all know only NYC and LA matter).  Now, they're talking about how prepared LA is if the "big one" hits one day, because I think they are finally realizing that this isn't it.
 
Who cares!  Talk about Stevenson.  Talk about Caylee.   Heck, even talk about the breaking news about Shia not being at fault.  Anything else, please!
Tags: Rants  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fool Me Twice...

Five months ago (two years, eleven months in political memory equivalent years), I found myself defending Obama to people I know who believed some of the outrageous rumors and made some mythical leaps in order to bash the O.  I said there is PLENTY to hit Obama with on his political views that we don't need to resort to the low-blow punched that came with the rumors. 
 
Then came "typical white person"-gate.  Well, it was more like a bump in the road.  I swore I would never defend the man again.  He made that statement with almost no question of him, and most have forgotten it.  Had he made a similar statement, McCain would have been run out of town and set on fire.  To be frank, that royally pissed me off, and I knew it would be a terrible thing for this country for that racist man to be our President.

Last week, however, I let my guard down.  Obama's prayer, which was removed from the prayer wall in Jerusalem, was printed by the Israeli, then American, press.  I blogged that I felt guilty for reading his private conversation with God, and I thought it shouldn't have been printed.

So of course, I got burned.  Obama leaked the damn note himself!  While his camp denies it was approved for publication, they don't dispute they sent a copy to the Israeli paper.  Why would you send a copy to a newspaper and not expect it to be printed?
 
Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me!  There won't be a third time. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Handouts Don't Work

"Give a man a fish, he eats for a day.  Teach a man to fish, he eats for life." 

That's an old addage that rings true.  However, it should be amended. 
 
"Give a man a fish, he eats for a day and expects you to give him another one tomorrow.  Teach a man to fish, he eats for life and doesn't bother you again."
 
Handouts don't work because they create an ongoing need and never solve the problem.  They have created this entitlement culture that society feeds upon and is found in every aspect of life now.  And most of those who live off the dole never learn how, nor do they have the drive, to remove themselves from the rolls.  I know -- I sqandered my opportunity to graduate college debt-free by running up credit cards during that time.  If I would have had to work to pay my college, I would not have put myself in that situation.
 
So here's the reason I'm writing this rant.  One of the couples who received one of those Extreme Makeover houses from ABC is now fighting foreclosure.  They were given a fantastic new 5,500 square-foot home with the mortgage being paid off by a local builder, who also gave them $100,000 in cash.  They were also given another $100,000 worth of furniture, home warranties, scholarships, and a car.  It was the largest home built at that time for the show.  They received the makeover because their septic tank would spew raw sewage into their home when it rained, and they had exhausted their savings in order to try to repair it.
 
Why would they be in foreclosure just 3 1/2 years later?  Because they took out a $450,000 second on the house just two years after receiving it!  They had no house payment, one car without a payment, scholarships for the kids, and they still managed to squander the gift.  They took out a loan to fund a construction business.  The husband already had a home security business.
 
I'm sorry, I just don't get it.  This was something so many others worked so hard to give them, and they just took it and gambled it away.  That's the handout mentality.  And as the numbers who voted in the Democratic primaries who, the number of people with that mentality is getting bigger and bigger every day. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So Wrong

While I am no fan of Obama and think this country would be in a world of hurt if he were elected at this time, what an Israeli newspaper did was wrong.  And I was wrong for clicking on the story.  But curiosity, unfortunately, got the best of me.
 
The Fox News Channel website is reporting that an Israeli newspaper published the contents of the note of prayer that Obama left in the cracks of the Western Wall in Jerusalem.  Another newspaper decided not to publish the prayer.  A Jewish seminary student removed the note.
 
I'm not sure what I was expecting when I clicked on the link.  I was sure he wasn't going to ask for something like, "God, please make me POTUS."  But I had to know.  And he didn't.  And I felt bad for reading it.  So, if you want to read it, it can easily be found.  I'm not going to link it here, because it was an ordinary private note of prayer that no one should have read.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DNC's Gas

Here is yet another do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do Democrat moment.

DNC has been getting tax-free gas over the past four months while preparing for the convention in Denver.  They have been filling up at city pumps, avoiding the 40 cents in state and local taxes, for "safety and security reasons."  I can just see all of the Republican operatives following committee members around town waiting to put sugar in gas tanks when they fill up.  Whatever! 
 
When questioned about the matter, an aide to Denver's mayor issued a statement that the committee would pay full market price for the gasoline, including the taxes. 

I have a feeling, however, that they thought they wouldn't have to pay the taxes.  When confronted, a spokesman for the committee said they would pay "if the city feels that taxes are applicable."
Tags: Politics   DNC  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The 47 Million Myth

Whenever I hear some number thrown out in the press, I find myself compelled to investigate.
 
Take the number of supposed uninsured Americans -- 47 million, including nine million children.  This has come up again and again during the election coverage and the call for universal healthcare.  Obama pledges these people will all be covered. 

But who are they?

As Dick Morris correctly points out, the 47 million number includes about 10 million illegal aliens.  Obama, although he says he will cover all 47 million, also says he won't cover illegals.  Not sure where he actually stands, but let's say that there are actually 37 million uninsured Americans.
 
Now, out of the 37 million, how many are willingly uninsured, that is, make enough money to afford it?  Well, about nine million of these people make over $75,000 per year.  It might be difficult at that income level to have health insurance when you have to pay for cable and an SUV and the gas for that SUV, but that's the choice made.  That brings the number down to 28 million unwillingly uninsured.
 
In the income level of $50,000 - $74,999, there are another 8.5 million who are uninsured.  While they make more than the median household income of $48,200, it might be difficult for a couple making $50,000 living in one of those tax-you-to-death cities like New York City to afford healthcare, so I will give this group the benefit of the doubt.  These income levels are not adjusted for cost of living in different areas.
 
So we're still at 28 million.  That's less than 10% of the population. 
 
During the S-CHIP debates, many sources quoted that six million of the nine million uninsured children in this number were eligible for current CHIP programs.  Six million!  That's six million kids whose parents had a resource for insurance coverage but did not take advantage of it. 
 
That's 22 million left.  Who makes up this number?  It includes adults in the age range of 18 - 24.  Many are in college or at a first job, relatively healthy, and are uninsured by choice.  This number also includes people in between jobs who will likely get coverage as soon as another job is found, which is usually an average of four months without insurance. 
 
How many are truly in need and can't afford coverage?  The Kaiser Family Foundation, a liberal non-profit organization, calls these people the chronically uninsured.  They make less than $50,000, have gone without insurance for two years or more, and are not eligible for government programs.  How many you ask?  They estimate between 8.2 and 13.9 million -- less than 5% of the population worst case scenario.
 
Think about that.  The Democrats want to move all 285 million Americans to a mandatory universal health care system to make sure that less than 5% of the whole has insurance.  With a mandatory system, fewer employers will bother having good coverage for employees when the government will provide adequate mandatory coverage that employers have to pay for with higher taxes anyway.  Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face.
 
The two reports I cited most are here and here, but there are SO many other resources that break down these numbers out there.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi Sends the Wrong Message

Nancy Pelosi today made this statement:
 
 
It is urgent that Congress send a message to the markets that we will act.

Guess what she was talking about.  Ha!  We can wish she was talking about oil. 

No, she was referring to the passage and removed veto threat of the housing boondoggle, I mean bill.  A bill that should not have passed.  A bill that gives money to people who bit off more than they could chew because they were "keeping up with the Jonses."  A bill that gives more money to lenders who ignored paperwork requirements and lent money to people who could not afford the payments.  Both of these groups dug their own holes and should have to sleep in them when kicked out of their houses.
 
Why, Nan, wouldn't this same logic work with oil?  Send a message.  Open up drilling on the OCS.  I'm sure the market would respond.  Then, you would actually be helping all Americans whose only mistake was electing untrustworthy politicians who printed money to spend (on things like housing boondoggles), lowered the value of the dollar, relaxed speculation requirements, refused to permit refineries, encouraged people to buy big houses in the suburbs and double commutes, which all helped cause oil prices to skyrocket. 
 
Fix the problem you actually caused.  Send the RIGHT message, Pelosi.
Tags: oil   Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »